Gensler’s Ethereum Dilemma: The Cryptocurrency Security Conundrum

SEC Chair Gary Gensler’s stance on Ethereum and other cryptocurrencies has sparked controversy, with critics accusing him of contradicting himself. While he avoided giving a clear answer during a recent appearance before a House Oversight Committee, a video from 2018 has emerged in which Gensler confidently stated that Ethereum is “not a security” according to the SEC’s opinion at the time.

Ethereum, the second-largest cryptocurrency, has long faced regulatory uncertainties. However, Gensler now asserts that Ethereum’s level of decentralization exempts it from being classified as a security. He referenced the SEC’s 2018 position, based on former Director of Corporate Finance William Hinman’s statement on Ethereum’s decentralized nature.

The irony was not lost on the crypto community, which swiftly highlighted the contradiction between Gensler’s recent statements and his 2018 lecture at MIT. A Twitter user named “ZK_shark” shared the lecture clip, which Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong subsequently retweeted. In the video, Gensler expressed his belief that the majority of tokens in the crypto market are “non-securities,” a stark departure from his current position as SEC Chair.

The below clip is from a Fall 2018 Graduate MIT course called "Blockchain and Money"

Gary Gensler – the current President of the SEC, was the professor.

The Hypocrisy speaks for itself 🐀

"So we already know in the US and in many other jurisdictions that 3/4 of the market… pic.twitter.com/rjRWeq5P8X

— zk-🦈 (@ZK_shark) April 25, 2023

Critics, however, argue that Gensler’s role as a professor and as a regulator requires different perspectives. Crypto lawyer Preston Byrne noted on Twitter that Gensler’s ability to discuss abstract concepts as a professor does not necessarily align with his obligation to enforce existing laws as a regulator.

Regulatory Confusion Surrounding Ethereum

Gensler’s evasiveness regarding Ethereum’s classification is not new. Last year, he also declined to provide a definitive answer when questioned. Industry figures, including CEOs and lawyers, have playfully criticized Gensler’s history of sidestepping direct questions.

To clarify, a security is a tradable financial asset with monetary value. Such as stocks or bonds that meet specific legal criteria outlined in the Howey Test. Gensler has stated that Bitcoin is a commodity rather than a security, making it the only crypto asset for which he has publicly offered an opinion.

During Gensler’s tenure, the SEC intensified its crypto industry crackdown. Kraken, Bittrex, and Coinbase, U.S.-based exchanges, faced recent scrutiny. This approach has drawn criticism from some political leaders, particularly Republican lawmakers. They argue that Gensler’s actions hinder regulation within the world’s largest economy and drive American tech companies abroad.

However, the ongoing debate on whether Ethereum is a security or commodity raises questions about regulatory clarity in cryptocurrency. SEC Chair Gary Gensler’s statements suggest Ethereum is not a security, but his recent refusal to give a clear answer has confused people.

Nevertheless, the SEC’s stricter actions in the crypto market and inconsistent regulatory guidance pose challenges for the industry and investors. The future of Ethereum and other cryptocurrencies depends on how regulatory frameworks adapt to this innovative digital asset class.

Related Reading | Ordinals: Unlocking New Possibilities For Bitcoin As A Cultural Layer